Which of the following is a consequence of policy conflict in Illumio?

In the context of Illumio and its approach to policy management, a consequence of policy conflict is the potential for security gaps. When multiple policies are in place, they may contradict each other or create ambiguity about what is allowed or denied in terms of network traffic between workloads. This inconsistency can lead to scenarios where legitimate traffic is incorrectly blocked or where malicious traffic is inadvertently permitted, resulting in vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers.

Addressing policy conflicts is crucial for maintaining a consistent security posture. If conflicts are not resolved, they can undermine the effectiveness of security measures, leaving systems exposed to risks. Therefore, understanding and managing these conflicts is essential to ensure that security policies are applied as intended and that all potential pathways for attack are adequately safeguarded.

In contrast, the other options do not correctly reflect the nature of consequences arising from policy conflict. Enhanced security and better team collaboration are not outcomes of conflict; rather, those typically arise from clear and well-implemented policies. Increased administrative workload may occur as teams work to resolve the conflicts, but the most critical outcome that directly affects security is indeed the potential for security gaps.